First, it was the antifa. Now … “Bloomberg anti-gun groups eye disrupting NRA convention”


We don’t go to Leftists’ events to disrupt them, but they ALWAYS come to ours to disrupt our events and attack us! (Trump rallies, Milo, Coulter, MacDonald, and now the NRA)

President Trump’s decision to be the first president in three decades to speak at the annual National Rifle Association convention is drawing heat from two anti-gun groups that now plan to travel to Atlanta to disrupt the massive event.

Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America and Everytown for Gun Safety — funded by former New York Mayor (((Michael Bloomberg))) — on Monday decried Trump’s plans and warned:

“Our volunteers will be in Atlanta during the NRA’s annual meeting, just as we have been showing up at town halls and in statehouses across the country to stand up for the safety of our families and communities. We will not be silenced.”

The 146th Annual NRA convention will be held April 27-30. It is a combined trade show and public affairs convention where supporters of the Second Amendment typically speak. Last year, for example, several GOP presidential candidates including Trump spoke.

As a result of Trump’s election, Moms, which is part of Everytown, charged in a statement that Trump was paying the NRA back with his speech and pro-gun agenda.

“Make no mistake: The gun lobby is already working to cash in on its investment,” said their statement. “Degrading our nation’s laws is a dream for NRA lobbyists and a nightmare for public safety,” it added.

More at:
Bloomberg anti-gun groups eye disrupting NRA convention

See also:
Gun-control groups vow demonstrations at Donald Trump’s speech to NRA – Washington Times

First, it was the antifa. Now … “Bloomberg anti-gun groups eye disrupting NRA convention”

One thought on “First, it was the antifa. Now … “Bloomberg anti-gun groups eye disrupting NRA convention”

  1. Every nation has its peculiarities, and their history.

    Many States have to respect these constitutional rights that people can carry weapons and have them (why are different States).

    Who wants to live surrounded by unarmed who go to live in another State.

    Anyway, in the conservative world; There is everything, move the financial interests primarily, sometimes are the contradictions.

    Personal no weapons attract me, professional individuals tend to interest you a little more.

    But I still say that the greatest defensive and protective weapon is in the mind of every person of good. It is a weapon of mass destruction against evil.

    There is a psychological in all these things look, when people don’t feel protected, find the choice of weapons to feel a little more confident of himself.

    But, weapons permits would not give any person, there has to be a precise control. Just as it would not give citizenship to a foreigner, there must be a control and a legal and real commitment to self-help.

    Another issue is to define firearm or weapon. Since we are surrounded by dangerous weapons (like vehicles) and are not considered dangerous weapons, but transport. We have seen it with the Islamic terrorist attacks. There are many more examples, you know.

    Every day I admire more G. Whasington.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s