Contrary to popular belief the Port Arthur massacre wasn’t a real massacre. Incredibly, despite the fact that it is fully established as a real event this is simply not the case. Rather, it was a hoax, just like Sandy Hook, the Boston smoke bombing fraud, the Nairobi mall shooting hoax, the Gabby Giffords shooting hoax, the fabricated DC shootings, and the Virginia Tech fake. Who would be surprised at this revelation? In fact, based on the latter-day frauds it would be expected that Port Arthur would be a terminal fake.
The result of this vile plot by the Zionists was dire. This was the purging of the rights of Australians to bear arms. A systematic, planned plot against the people was put into place well before the hoax event. There would be no public resistance, as the sentiment of the people would not allow them to raise their voices or resistance too vigorously in the face of a public massacre.
Furthermore, it has been demonstrated here, repeatedly, that there are no coincidences in life. For instance, the Dunblane hoax occurred in 1996, the same year as the Port Arthur fraud. This is by plan, not via happenstance. The wretched Zionist cabal placed both the UK and Australia in its cross-hairs simultaneously, crushing the people’s rights through fabricated massacres. The plot against the people was hatched exclusively by Zionist Jews. The Rothschild cabal, along with the Rockefeller clique, are fully culpable for this vile attack against the people’s inalienable rights.
Now, there is no doubt about the fact that, like Sandy Hook, Nairobi, and the Boston smoke bombing hoax – as well as Dunblane – this, too, was faked. In other words, there really wasn’t any massacre. In fact, there was no shooting in Tasmania at that time at all. Let it be reiterated in 1996 there was no massacre of any kind in Port Arthur.
The shooter, who, in fact, was non-existent, that is he wasn’t in Port Arthur at the time, achieved the untenable. He shot up virtually the entire facility and moved around like a professional mercenary. In fact, in his acclaimed achievement and movements he outdid even the most well-trained and ruthless mercenary known. Even in Hollywood movies no one has done what the Port Arthur ‘shooter’ has accomplished.
He kills people in the restaurant, roasts others alive in their cars, burns up buses and vans, “siezes” an entire lodge (not just any lodge but one some 5 km away from the original attack site), commandeers a car, stuffing the male occupant in the trunk, shoots at rescue crews and helicopters, peppers the police with gunfire, takes hostages: all in a matter of hours.
There are 200 police-people in the surrounds, and they can do nothing to halt his progress over a matter of two or more hours? He has two hours-plus to do all this without even the slightest resistance? Moreover, there isn’t a crack shooter in all of Australian who could have taken him out and stopped this carnage? It is not only implausible, but it is also patently impossible.
They “recover” some “32” victims – dead people yet can do nothing to halt the actions of this supposed shooter? He can keep 200 police-persons at bay after taking down 32 people and, then, hold hostages? None of it is believable, because it truly is unbelievable.
Hostages held in final siege
from page 1 of The Australian, April 29, 1996
by Bruce Montgomery
The death toll in Australia’s worst massacre reached 32 last night as more victims were recovered from the historic Port Arthur convict settlement where a lone gunman was holding at least three hostages in a nearby guesthouse. In possibly the world’s worst shooting spree, a young man — described by witnesses as in his teens or early 20s and like a “surfie” in appearance — opened fire on visitors at the site’s cafe and souvenir shop with a high-powered rapid-fire rifle he slipped from a tennis bag.
As shocked witnesses left through the police cordon sealing off the Port Arthur area in southern Tasmania, they recounted horrific scenes of the gunman’s two-hour rampage through the tourist attraction, including a young mother’s insistent plea to emergency workers to treat her dead daughter. There were also reports the gunman had incinerated tourists in their cars and boarded a tourist bus, shooting the driver and a number of passengers. Tasmania’s police commissioner, Mr. John Johnson, told a media conference at police headquarters late last night that more than 30 people, including tourists, locals and children, were confirmed dead and a further 18 injured.
Johnson said the massacre made the Queen Street and Hoddle Street killings in Melbourne “pale into insignificance.” The world’s worst recorded massacre by a lone gunman occured on February 25, 1994, when Jewish settler (Baruch Goldstein) machine-gunned 29 Palestinians and wounded 80 as they prayed in a mosque in the West Bank village of Hebron…
“Police negotiators are talking to the man and I just hope that whoever he is he realises the terrible thing he has done and gives himself up,” Mr. Johnson said.
Editor’s note: The massacre by Zionist extremist Baruch Goldstein, a hate-filled American Jew, may his soul rot in hell forever, was real and fully documented.
The killing spree, which has left police baffled for a motive, brought fresh calls for stricter firearm laws, with gun control lobbies calling for immediate federal intervention to institute a national gun code. The federal Attorney-General, Mr .Williams, last night undertook to press for changes to national gun laws and will place the issue on the agenda of the police ministers’ meeting in July.
Editor’s note: The immediate action against the people of Australia by Zionist moles and their collaborators, such as Williams, Howard, and Johnson, is categorical proof of a scam and a hoax.
The carnage also brought messages of sympathy from around the country, among them the Prime Minister, Mr. Howard, the Leader of the Opposition, Mr. Beazley, the Tasmanian Premier, Mr. Rundle, and the Governer-General, Sir William Deane (all plants by powerful Zionist millionaires and billionaires).
A state of emergency is in place with more than 200 police — 20 per cent of the state’s force — on duty around the scene (Notice the nature of the drill, with commentary such as “on duty around the scene, the purpose of which was to isolate the region, making sure no actual independent investigative individual can document the fabrications and fraud), supported by the SES. Doctors and medical staff were rushed to hospitals in Hobart and the RAAF was placed on standby at the height of the drama. Police negotiators were last night maintaining telephone contact with the man, who is holed up at the Seascape Lodge, a small guesthouse a few kilometres from the Port Arthur site, where it is believed he has one man hostage and possibly others.
Editor’s addition: Did anyone read what was said? It was merely “Doctors and medical staff” who “were rushed to hospitals in Hobart,” not any real victims. Plus, even the Zionists essentially admit to the fake, saying that it was rather than a shocking slaughter a “drama.”
There are unconfirmed reports the gunman snatched the male hostage after commandeering a car, shooting a woman in the passenger seat three times before dumping her body and placing her husband in the boot.
Special Operations Group snipers were among the police dragnet in place around the lodge, which is flanked by open paddocks on one side and water on the other.
“The man is in a building that has attic rooms which give him a good view of the surrounding area. He is firing at police,” Mr. Johnson said. “There are three people in the house with him, I hope they are still alive, it is a hostage situation.”
Editor’s note: One hostage, two hostages, three hostages, several hostages, no hostages, people stuffed into trunks: which one is it, or is it all of the above?
The gunman also shot at helicopters airlifting his victims from the scene to hospital in Hobart and police said gunfire was still coming from the lodge after darkness. One report on police radio said: “He’s got some police officers down there and he’s shooting at them, and we also believe that the people who are in Seascape are returning fire at the offender.”
The drama began at about 1.30 pm (that’s now twice that the word “drama” was used) when the man arrived at the historic convict ruins — Tasmania’s most popular tourist attraction, enjoying its busiest weekday with more than 600 visitors — in a Volkswagon or Volvo car (can’t make up your mind about the car, either?) carrying a tennis bag. He ate lunch at the Broad Arrow cafe, speaking “lucidly” to other visitior about the large number of WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants) and lack of “Japs” before taking the weapon from the bag and opening fire.
He hunted victims in the cafeteria, the adjoining souvenir shop and the site’s carpark before attacking a bus. He also blazed at the nearby Fox and Hounds Hotel before taking the hostages and seizing the Seascape Lodge, 5 km away.
NOTE: He did all this despite being surrounded by 20% of the region’s police force, crack snipers, and SES gunmen. No one even got a shot off at him, but, then, that was the basis of the hostage story line, that is “We couldn’t do anything. He’d taken hostages.”
Mr. Ron Atkins, of Sydney, said that he and his wife Karen had been inspecting some of the old cottages when they heard gunfire coming from the cafeteria area.
“People began running for cover. We had thought that it was all part of the show down there but we were quickly ushered into the old medical officer’s cottage for our protection,” he said. “Officials told everybody to get inside. We went upstairs, there must have been at least 50 of us in there.” Mrs. Atkins said she had been speaking to a woman who had met the gunman in the Broad Arrow Cafe.
Editor’s note: Is this the best the Zionist cabal can offer, which is to give third-party witnesses, the Atkins clique, never offering any direct witnesses or even the slightest degree of photography, videos, or surveillance footage? “Somebody I met told me” is the best these vile fabricators can offer.
“He was a young fellow, about 18 or 19, he looked like a surfie; he arrived in a Volkswagen and he walked into the cafeteria carrying a tennis bag,” she said.
“State of emergency… an injured survivor of the Port Arthur massacre arrives on Hobart’s Domain to be ferried to Royal Hobart Hospital.”
Caption per the Zionists: Doctors and medical teams around the State were placed on stand-by and triage teams at Royal Hobart stood waiting for the first ambulances to arrive.
Not content with shooting his victims once, the gunman turned his sights on the emergency helicopters, — Pictures: Kim Eiszele, Fred Kohl”
The following is a summary of the hoax, one which varies to some degree with the Zionist’s own story lines, even though this, too, is published by them:
“1. At 1.30pm the gunmen enters the Broad Arrow Cafe and pulls a high-powered rifle out of a tennis bag and begins shooting indiscriminately at adults and children. He then moves out into the car park, shooting others dead and setting fire to a number of cars possibly with people inside them.”
“2. He then leaves the site, shooting people as they arrive at the toll booth. By now 12 people are dead.”
Our note: The toll booth claim is a curious addition to this novel. How did anyone know that by “toll booth” time the count was 12 corpses?
“3. He then shoots several people at the Fox and Hounds Hotel, and moves up the road to the Seascape Lodge where he take hostages at 3.30pm, fires at helicopters taking his victims to hospital and exchanges fire with the police surrounding him.”
In fact, he did none of the above. Regardless, his identity is fictitious. So are any relationships – family, father, mother, girlfriend, and more. Consider the following evidence of a fabricated identity, which is a heavily corrupted, photoshopped picture of the supposed (but non-existent) shooter, Martyn Bryant:
It depicts Martin with his presumed girlfriend, a woman named Petra Wilmot,a mere three months (Feb. 1996) prior to the event. How did he grow his hair so fast? He surely had such a hairdo, since the key ‘eyewitnesses’ all described him as a “surfie,” moreover that he was merely 19 years-old. Then, how did he suddenly became younger in 90 days? Did they give the shooter youth serum?
Notice the bizarre nature of the angle of his waste to his torso, on the left, the hook finger/hand, the bizarre nature of the left leg as being exceedingly straight, the whitish defect of his forehead and the hook nature of his anatomically distorted add-on right hand. Where is Wilmot’s right hand? Is she wearing a glove?
Too, notice the hard evidence of fabricated identities, which is the placement of people’s images artificially into the scene. This is proven by the presence of cut lines about the head as well as the use of the Photoshop blur tool:
The white border around her hair is a residue of the use of the Photoshop cutting tool, as is the squiggly line between the two heads, the latter being entirely aberrant compared to the background. Regarding ‘Bryant,’ there is obvious use of the blur tool on the forehead and chest. This is a hack-job in Photoshop, completely fabricated.
What about the victims? They, too, are fabrications. The only difference is that they are not actual images altered by Photoshop. Rather, they are not human, images or otherwise, in any way or degree. Instead, they are dummies, that’s right, the 1990s version of dapper cadaver crisis dummies:
What is seen? It is none other than a dapper cadaver (dummy used for staging fake killings and injuries). This is absolute proof that Port Arthur was faked.
Note the nature of the same, wide, bloated torso as seen with the other crisis dummies and also the nature of the pelvis and extremities. There is no doubt about it this is a cadaver dummy dressed with fake blood which is applied by a moulage mole. Note the color of the fake blood on the floor compared to the color of the residue of blood from the real victims of slaughter at the hands of the Zionist extremist.
Even the miserable red tags were added by Photoshop. What did the coroner do, tag them, take pictures, and then turn the pictures over to the Zionists, so they could go for the guns?
The fake stiff, left screen, is the most glaringly obvious proof of the fabrication thus far. What is this fake corpse doing? Is he not holding up his own tag against gravity? The dummy seems to have a grip on its edge. Not really, though; it was inserted via Photoshop, which is glaringly evident by the fake corpse, right screen. Regardless, why would anyone be showing off the red tags? This is the element of the macabre. No one would do so unless it was all a mere fabrication. Of note, the images were kept blurry purposely, that is as a part of the deception.
Even so, does anyone see any wounds? Is there even the slightest evidence of arterial spurting? Why is the blood only found slopped on the crisis dummies? It’s mere tempura paint and/or red food dye-colored corn syrup. There is nothing real about these images.
Here is the Port Arthur so-called morgue truck. It was called up in advance. Who in the world needs a “morgue truck” for a shooting?
Therefore, Port Arthur is a fake, just as is Sandy Hook, Dunblane, and the Boston smoke bombing hoax. No element of this event, as claimed, is real, including the existence of actual victims, whether wounded or deceased. This means that all who claim that this event was real are fraudsters and hucksters, many of whom worked for mere pay to play out their acts.